Profile
Name
Logicked
Description
Entertaining responses to bad arguments, with a focus on atheism and debunking religion.
All content is protected under DMCA Fair Use.
If you want me to be a voice in your game, audiobook, etc., send me an email or Discord DM.
I make no claim to being a scientist, philosopher, historian, mathematician, astrophotographer, journalist, wine expert, golf champion, or space marine. I am a self-educated layman and these videos are partially a learning tool. If I make a claim, double-check it before you take it as fact. I'm as fallible as anyone and there are a few known errors in my videos. But my arguments and reasoning stand or fall on their own merits.
All content is protected under DMCA Fair Use.
If you want me to be a voice in your game, audiobook, etc., send me an email or Discord DM.
I make no claim to being a scientist, philosopher, historian, mathematician, astrophotographer, journalist, wine expert, golf champion, or space marine. I am a self-educated layman and these videos are partially a learning tool. If I make a claim, double-check it before you take it as fact. I'm as fallible as anyone and there are a few known errors in my videos. But my arguments and reasoning stand or fall on their own merits.
Subscribers
140K
Subscriptions
Friends (4)
Channel Comments
|
Gozuma2
(4 minutes ago)
Kent Hovind is living PROOF that something that's infinitely dense can exist.
|
|
N8Dawgg314
(10 minutes ago)
"How did we get the rest of the elements? Plus the /synthetic/ ones?" did....did he just ask how synthetic elements were created naturally?
|
|
Happypuppy6666
(17 minutes ago)
I love this series, when i feel crappy or down. I just play this and it reminds I'm nowhere near as stupid as Kent's arguments. Thank you for making this series logic.
|
|
TheBibleReloaded
(28 minutes ago)
Oh Boy...here we go
|
|
armouredskeptic
(31 minutes ago)
Oh HELL yes! Taking on the Hovind series!!!
|
|
alienape3171
(46 minutes ago)
I love how Kent's audience laughs at things they don't understand.
|
|
NotOnQ
(52 minutes ago)
I like how he questioned how the 92 elements, INCLUDING synthetic ones, were made... Great job little Kenty, you don't know what synthetic elements are!
|
|
TheExceedermjw
(2 hour ago)
Listening to the this the umpteenth time, am I the only one who notices that Hovind's snarky remarks, his constant laughing, etc, is much like the mannerisms of a schoolyard bully?
|
|
Peteralleyman
(1 hour ago)
His fellow inmates must have felt relieved the moment he was released from prison.
|
|
Sinclairelim
(2 hours ago)
15:30
|
|
TheNightWatcher1385
(13 hours ago)
I was a big follower of Kent Hovind back in the day. Watching him now feels like seeing myself with 80s hair. What was I thinking?
|
|
TheWesman45
(19 hours ago)
Seriously, why do people laugh at science for revising its data? That's literally the cornerstone of science. Observations+ hypothesis + experiment= data. Which is reviewed and revised as the process is altered and repeated until a data point stands up to review. It's like if you built a car with one wheel,, it went ten feet and crashed. Then you built a car with two wheels, it's very unstable. You build a car with three wheels, it rolls under hard turning/braking. You build a car with four wheels, it functions well and you build on that concept. It's like these people would be okay with science if it settled for the first car and never refined it's findings... I swear man, it comes down to closure for these people. They HATE nuance and vagueness. The unknown frightens them soooo much they don't even try to vet any data they've been given. They have satiated that question, regardless of the answer's validity. It's been answered and that's good enough. Blows my mind that people can live that way...
|
|
EdwardHowton
(23 hours ago)
Listen, if you're going to ask Kent Hovind to introduce himself, you should at least quote directly from his doctoral dissertation:
|
|
pdoylemi
(21 hours ago)
This is what a Hovind citation list would look like:
|
Add comment