Please turn up and normalize the audio, it is really difficult to hear

in lots of cases the p-value changes from area of science, for example in human behavioral studies the p-value is typically greater than 0.5, for things like detecting fraud the tax office uses well bellow 0.1 when looking for statistical anomalies, this is when you get flagged and they begin an investigation. maliciously using p-value to change the outcome of a study is not new, my uni professor had a great quote (i don't know if it was his lol) "data can say anything if you bully it hard enough". so p-value isn't the whole story when falsifying data its not even close.

Ultimately, the problem is not the abitrary selection of the optimal p-value; it's instead dishonesty and fraud.

I spent a WEEK trying to understand this for a college paper months ago and now youtube recomends me this. This is mental terrorism

Shouldn't anything close to 0.05 just be "inconclusive"

It's especially concerning in most areas of psychology, but it's difficult to reject as without it, psych has almost no grounds to stand on as a science.

Brother I can't understand your English, it is so thick, my ears are hurting trying to pinpoint the words