You are correct. All three stars have one solar mass, so none of them are considered "primary." Each star is also just within 1 AU of one or both of its companions. The idea was to create a model to see how the accretion process would work in a tertiary system. Binary systems are easy to model, and not nearly as "messy" as a tertiary system.

Subatomic particles like Quarks in a proton probably move the same way. Looks like a Möbius strip, or infinity sign. So beautiful. Thank you for sharing this!

Would this be more practical with planets of similar mass rather than stars?

The cosmic ballet... goes on.

How accurate is this? Would it be possible to see a similar, stable system of orbits?

So they all three have to be roughly the same mass in order to be within eachothers gravitational field and not lose ordit influence, right?

So when are these three going to have a conjunction? I need to know, need to restore a shard...

This is the cosmic equivalent of the shell game.

So, they will eventually cancel out. Will they eventually join to one mass?

Which is the primary star?

It looks like someone is juggling them

that's theoretically and practically impossible , on a single star other two stars gravity influences and things go weird

SCIENCE!!!!